Section 125 Does Not Exclude Redemption Fine from SVLDR Scheme: Rajasthan HC
Rajasthan HC quashed rejection of an SVLDR declaration, holding redemption fine is covered under the Scheme and does not render a declarant ineligible under Section 125.
ITAT Upholds ₹680.62 Cr Ad, Marketing & Cooler Expense Deductions, Remands Section 80G Claim
Revenue Cannot Challenge One Year After Accepting Same KVAT ITC Method in Earlier Years: Karnataka HC
Karnataka HC Remands Section 271(1)(c) Penalty After Revival of Assessment Orders
Search Cases With Common Assessing Officer Governed by Section 127 Transfer Date: ITAT Delhi
Calcutta HC Dismisses Challenge to Section 148 Notice Issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer
LTCG Genuine as No Link to Share Price Rigging Was Proved: ITAT Mumbai
Gujarat HC Upholds Section 10(38) Exemption as LTCG Was Supported by Evidence
ITAT Mumbai Deletes Section 68 Addition on Sunrise Asian Shares LTCG Claim
Karnataka HC Sets Aside GST Refund Rejection and Remands Section 54 Refund Claim
How to Respond to GST Notices: A Practical Guide for Taxpayers
Karnataka HC Permits Withdrawal of GST Writ After GSTAT Becomes Functional
GST Registration Cancellation Due to Consultant’s Lapse: Telangana HC Allows Revocation
Ancestral Property Not Immune from Attachment Under PMLA: Delhi HC
MSMED Benefits Not Available to Supplier for Pre-Registration Supplies: Delhi HC
Article 227 Interference Limited to Jurisdictional Errors in Arbitration Appeals: SC
IBBI Cancels Insolvency Professional Registration Over CIRP Compliance and Due Diligence Lapses
CESTAT Allows Customs Refund, Says Missing Challan No Ground to Reject Claim
CESTAT Sets Aside Customs Demand as Extended Limitation Not Invocable in Classification Dispute
Madras HC: Choosing Writ Over Custom Appeal Not Sufficient Cause for Delay
Aluminium Formwork Classifiable Under CTH 76109010, CESTAT Kolkata Allows Exemption
CESTAT Delhi Allows CENVAT Credit on Sub-Contractor and Imported Input Services
CESTAT Delhi allowed CENVAT credit on services received from sub-contractors and on service tax paid under reverse charge before 18.04.2006.
Orissa HC Dismisses Review as Section 260A Permits Reformulation of Questions
HC dismissed the review petition, holding that reformulation of a substantial question under Section 260A caused no illegality and warranted no review.
Higher Profits Alone Cannot Invoke Section 80-IA(10) to Restrict Section 10B Deduction: Bombay HC
Bombay HC quashed the restriction of Section 10B deduction, holding that Section 80-IA(10) requires findings of an arrangement producing more than ordinary profits.
CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty &…
Adv Akruti Goyal, a practicing CA handling GST compliance from 2015-2021. Qualified as a lawyer in…
