Right to set-off loss is a “vested right” which is available despite amendment in year of set-off

In the Case of: Geetanjali Trading Limited Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Decided By : ITAT Mumbai, Appeal No:  I.T.A. No. 5428/ MUM/ 2007.

In AY 2002-03, the assessee suffered a long-term capital loss. U/s 74(1) as it then stood, such loss could be carried forward and set off against all capital gains including short-term capital gains. S. 74 was amended in AY 2003-04 to provide that long-term capital loss could only be set-off against long-term capital gains and not against short-term-capital gain.

Read the rest of this entry »

Bonus stripping under the Income tax lens

After taxing investors for dividend stripping, the Income Tax (I-T) Department is gearing up to tax bonus stripping. Official sources say scrutiny of returns filed by companies, brokers and individuals active in the stock markets and in possession of shares revealed wide use of this mechanism to evade tax.

Read the rest of this entry »

Set off of long term capital loss with indexation against long term capital gains without indexation is allowable

CASE LAW DETAILS

Decided by: ITAT, MUMBAI BENCH `B’, MUMBAI,  In The case of: Keshav S. Phansalkar  v. ITO,   Appeal No.: ITA NO. 3261/MUM/2007,
Decided on: JUNE 3, 2009

RELEVANT PARAGRAPH

8. Section 70(3) of the Act postulates that for any assessment year where there is a loss in respect of long term capital asset, the asscssee shall be entitled to have the amount of such loss set off against the income, if any fas arrived at under a similar computation) made for the assessment year in respect of any other long term capital asset.

Read the rest of this entry »

IT department investigating tax evasion by showing bogus investment losses, May take action against chartered accountants

Income tax department in the past has stumbled up on many strange things, but nothing as strange as a company exclusively providing bogus stock contract notes to evade taxes, a trail that may lead to it knocking on the doors of many auditors.  The Mumbai I-T department estimates that around Rs 1,000 crore of taxes may have been evaded by producing these bogus investment losses, and it now knows the beneficiaries too, a senior department official in the know of things said.

Read the rest of this entry »

In case of gifted Assets, indexation benefit is available from the year of acquisition of the previous owner

This article summarizes a recent ruling of the Special Bench (SB) of the Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) [ITA No. 7315/Mum/2007] in the case of DCIT vs. Manjula Shah (Taxpayer) which held that, in the case of gifted capital asset, indexation benefit is available to a donee from the year of its acquisition by the previous owner. The SB adopted a purposive construction of the definition of ‘Indexed Cost of Acquisition’ (ICOA) by looking at the scheme of the Indian Tax Law (ITL), which seeks to grant the benefit of cost and holding period of the previous owner to the donee.

Read the rest of this entry »

Taxability of the income from the sale of shares in the hands of resident in Mauritius

Recently, the Delhi bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) in the case of DDIT v. M/s Saraswati Holding Corpn. Inc. (2009-TIOL-529-ITAT-DEL)  ruled on the taxability of the income from the sale of shares in the hands of resident in Mauritius. The Tribunal held that the taxpayer holding tax residence certificate of Mauritius, was entitled to the exemption provided under Article 13(4) of the India-Mauritius tax treaty (the tax treaty). The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of UOI v. Azadi Bachao Andolan [2003] 236 ITR 706 (SC).

Read the rest of this entry »

Consideration for permission to use TDR / FSI not chargeable to tax: ITAT Mumbai

The assessee co-op housing society gave permission to a developer to construct 2 floors and 8 flats on the building belonging to the society by using the TDR / FSI available to the developer. In consideration, the developer paid Rs. 26 lakhs to the assessee and Rs. 66 lakhs to its members aggregating Rs. 92 lakhs.

Read the rest of this entry »

Even exempt capital gains are includible in “book profits”

The assessee earned long-term capital gains of Rs. 40.57 L which was not chargeable to tax u/s 54EC. As the said gains were credited to the P&L A/c, the assessee excluded the gains whilst computing “book profits” u/s 115JB in view of the Special Bench judgement in Sutlej Cotton Mills 45 ITD 22 (Cal) (SB) where it had been held that non-taxable capital receipts had to be excluded from book profits. The AO and the CIT (A) rejected the claim. On appeal by the assessee HELD dismissing the appeal:

Read the rest of this entry »